Why the Right Has Such Lousy Information

i-65852b51ef52889c0f5e7cd2ef5908bb-journalist.gifYou have to be a certain age to remember the days when Republicans tended to be better informed and more rational than their opponents. Back before the conservative media complex took on its present shape, conservatives constructed their vision of reality from the same pool of facts generally available to everyone else. They just drew a different set of conclusions about that picture than their rivals on the left.

Going back as far as the sixties, many on the Republican right flank became convinced that they were losing not because their ideas were unpersuasive, but because the media landscape was hopelessly tilted against them. Guys like Nixon aide Roger Ailes envisioned a counter-balance, a conservative journalistic infrastructure that might counter this tilt.

Ailes and other conservative media critics were both right and wrong. While it is true that Journalism is an inherently liberal institution, they were completely wrong about what that means. Their “success” generating a parallel news institution coincided with the emergence of unfiltered, Internet-based media to spawn a storm of unintended consequences for Republicans.

Instead of an alternative news source, conservative media has developed into a dangerous misinformation machine, threatening to cripple conservatism by blinding it. Self-identified conservatives are now some of the most hopelessly and militantly misinformed voters in our system. It may be too late to repair the damage.

Conservative media is nothing new.  There has always been a strong culture of conservative commentary, producing figures like William F. Buckley and George Will. What’s new in this landscape is the attempt to manufacture a completely unnatural creature – conservative journalism.

No one should trust a liberal police force or a conservative university. Some institutions are inherently bent toward a certain philosophical perspective. Conservatism, as a philosophy, is built on a respect for tradition, history, and inherited authority. Conservatism values faith more than doubt. It places a higher premium on belief than on inquiry. Conservatives are suspicious of any force that would upset traditional understandings of the world or challenge the established order, with good reason.

Journalism seeks to establish a set of facts through inquiry, investigation, and relentless doubt. Journalism is perpetually at odds with authority, a nuisance to the privileged. Good journalists are relentless turd disturbers who refuse to let well enough alone. Journalism is based on liberal values.

Journalists, individually, tend to be liberal in their philosophical orientation because the profession largely demands it. There aren’t a lot of liberal FBI agents or conservative reporters. Journalism is as a discipline is the most accurate and reliable method for uncovering news. That does not mean that journalists, or liberals, formulate the best policies. It means that journalists do the best job of uncovering the facts on which intelligent policy decisions are made.

Conservatives like Roger Ailes imagined they could build an inherently conservative journalistic enterprise. They ended up with a product that straddles the line between tabloid and propaganda. Imbue Journalism with conservative values and you will stop getting news. Take away the liberal-oriented critical thinking that goes into the journalistic process and you will get a consistently misleading picture of reality.

This may not matter if you are merely looking to build a base for political activism, but it will exact a merciless price when you need to operate intelligently in the world. If you wish to govern, rhetoric must at some point bend to external realities. Failure to accurately calculate those external realities is like driving blind.

Liberal journalists might vote for Democrats, but theirs’ are the methods that will tell you accurately what’s happening in the world whether you like it or not. They may not draw the right conclusions about policies or philosophy, but they will always do a better job than conservatives at reporting the news. Tune them out and you’ll get unskewed polls, endless fantasy scandals, a deluded base, and a political movement that is never capable of governing.

Conservative’s misguided hostility to the “lamestream media” is the Achilles heel of the modern Republican Party. Obama’s secret weapon in every political standoff with Republicans is that he actually knows what’s happening. Democrats are no smarter than Republicans. They just cheat by turning on their headlights.

Fox News, Breitbart, and the rest of the right wing journalistic engine are political opium. They deliver a rush of unskewed reality that briefly soothes the ache of cognitive dissonance that increasingly ruins conservatives’ moods. Conservatives have consistently lousy information because the rise of Fox News coincided with the Internet age to create a storm of disinformation, too tantalizing to turn down.

There are only two functioning political parties in this country. It will always be possible for Republicans to win some elections no matter how dysfunctional the party becomes. The price of our hostility to information comes not from elections, but from in our steeply declining capacity to govern and the weakening of conservatism as a relevant political philosophy.

It is unclear how many failures it may take to shock the American right out of its stupor, but the toll from this binder is mounting. We could be in for a long, painful ride. Perhaps it’s time to buy more gold?

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Political Theory, Republican Party

Tips for Evaluating Science in a Policy Debate

Really interesting advice from the journal Nature:

In this context, we suggest that the immediate priority is to improve policy-makers’ understanding of the imperfect nature of science. The essential skills are to be able to intelligently interrogate experts and advisers, and to understand the quality, limitations and biases of evidence. We term these interpretive scientific skills. These skills are more accessible than those required to understand the fundamental science itself, and can form part of the broad skill set of most politicians.

To this end, we suggest 20 concepts that should be part of the education of civil servants, politicians, policy advisers and journalists — and anyone else who may have to interact with science or scientists. Politicians with a healthy skepticism of scientific advocates might simply prefer to arm themselves with this critical set of knowledge.

The full article: Policy: Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims

Posted in Uncategorized

Preparing for Thanksgiving: From the Onion

It’s that time again. Keep the conversation civil and focus on football. Let’s be careful out there…

From the Onion: Siblings Gather Around PowerPoint To Hash Out Off-Limits Topics For Thanksgiving

“As you can see here, we’re unsure whether or not cousin Jessica is actually college-bound, so we’re going to avoid that subject and stick to the key talking points listed in this table,” said Alyssa Conroy, 26, during the siblings’ 48-slide presentation, which reportedly featured pie charts breaking down the state and national voting histories of extended family members, as well as Venn diagrams illustrating what each relative knows about their father’s upcoming surgery.

Posted in Uncategorized

It’s Getting Harder to Love College Football

What you won't be seeing on Thursday.

What you won’t be seeing on Thursday.

Our family Thanksgiving schedule will be a little lighter this year, with more harmony and fewer tears. We will no longer be forced to arrange travel plans and meals around events in College Station or Austin. The Longhorn – Aggie rivalry is gone. We are all poorer for it. All of us, except for a few people. A few people are definitely richer thanks to this arrangement.

College football is a unique experience. As exciting as the NFL can be, with all its speed, precision and finesse, there are moments when it feels like you’re just watching someone work. Because you are. By contrast, on Saturday afternoon you are watching young people who for the most part will never earn a penny from sports, play a game.

Unfortunately, our relentless push to commoditize every aspect of our existence is draining away much of what makes college football unique. Our love for college football is being converted to cash in a big way. As traditions are sold out and billions of dollars are traded on the students’ backs, it is hard not to feel like you’re abetting a fraud. It may be too late to save college football, but perhaps the lessons from its corruption might help us rescue other critical social institutions before they are sold off for spare parts.

College football was fun because of it what it represented. The students did it for the challenge of becoming truly good at something. They did it out of loyalty to a community. They did it to push themselves, to experience the thrills, pain, and sometimes disappointment that comes from striving for personal and collective goals. A year as a starting fullback should be an excellent preparation for what life has in store. Watching college football was watching young men grow up.

What happens to a hallowed cultural institution that becomes a multi-billion dollar enterprise? Ask Santa Claus.

When there are TV contracts on the line, tradition and history are too expensive to retain. You won’t have to schedule your Thanksgiving around the Texas – Texas A&M game because the Aggies have now joined the nation’s most elite NFL farm league.

The annual Michigan – Notre Dame game is history. Not enough money in it. The Southwest Conference is no more, gone the way of “three yards and a cloud of dust.” The wishbone was good clean fun, but it lacked the flash that television demands.

It is getting harder to love college football as the game bends under pressure from its business model. The football program at the University of Texas earned a $71m profit on only $95m in revenue last year. Coach Mack Brown earned $5m, which is pretty conservative based on such a spectacular profit margin.

Those margins are possible because the folks doing the work are compensated exclusively at the company store. The guys who make it all happen get paid with an education, sort of. The demands of life on a semi-pro team don’t leave much time for books.  Just over half of the University of Texas’ football players earn a degree. They have more important things to do.

As college football becomes another commoditized entertainment experience, all of the participants are losing. The true amateur athletes, kids whose main focus was an education, are being crowded out as the universities are converted into an NFL minor league.

Those promising athletes are getting a nominal education at best in return for their efforts. Graduation rates are ticking upward as the NCAA works to shine its image, but how many of those players are actually receiving meaningful compensation for their efforts? The value of the institution is being compromised at every level in order to pursue ever greater revenue opportunities.

If college football is just entertainment, and entertainment is just a product, and products are created to make money, then I start to feel a little silly investing emotional energy in the A&M – LSU game. More and more the institution carries the distracting odor of a swindle. It’s hard to tell whether I’m the mark or whether I’m in on the grift.

In that case there’s nothing special about college football. It’s just like pro football, only slower and clumsier with poor quality special-teams play. At least the pros are getting paid and they are delivering a top quality product.

Some schools have managed to keep college in college football. Notre Dame manages a 97% graduation rate while fielding a consistently competitive program. Elite universities like Stanford and Boston College maintain quality teams and quality education, but the sport is moving away from them. The end of the Notre Dame-Michigan tradition is a warning of what’s to come. The business of college football is advancing with little regard for the core mission of the universities that feed it.

It’s hard to say what should happen with college football. Paying the players would certainly be fairer, but it would finish off whatever remains of an institution that once meant far more than money. The arcane rules put in place to protect college athletics from market forces have spawned a densely complex culture of cheating, a tradition almost as old as the sport. How long can Universities, bastions of enlightened rational values, continue this charade? What toll is it taking on the wider goals of those institutions?

College football may be a necessary casualty of a freer, more prosperous world. We are all likely to cling to the remains at least a little while longer. Maybe someday (next year?), when the Longhorns’ helmets are sporting a giant BestBuy logo and the program is playing two additional highly-paid exhibition games each year against the likes of Abilene Christian and the fighting Javelinas of A&M Kingsville we’ll finally have to give it up. Until then we’ll settle for watching the Longhorns play some Panhandle technical college on Thanksgiving evening and pretend everything is fine.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Economics

Steve Stockman is Finally Getting the Attention He Deserves

Steve Stockman’s financial affairs are just as bizarre as his politics. Stockman has pulled this stuff before. He was chased out of office in ’96 after only one miserable term, but like herpes, he just won’t go away.He became the poster child for the unintended consequences of the sudden ’94 GOP wave and now, thanks to the wisdom of voters in my old East Texas home, he’s actually back in Congress.

Here’s a first effort to untangle the reeking mess of his financial dealings, from Lise Olsen at the Houston Chronicle:

That 2002 bankruptcy was raised as an issue when Stockman again ran for Congress in 2012. Stockman blamed his financial hardship on expenses incurred caring for his father, described in campaign literature as a World War II veteran who suffered from Alzheimer’s disease and died in 2004.

“My father raised me with the morals and convictions I have today and I’d gladly go bankrupt again to take care of my Dad,” Stockman said, according to campaign literature.

Presidential Trust is only one of at least 17 different business names and corporate identities Stockman has established over the years in Texas, Virginia, Nevada, New Mexico and the British Virgin Islands. At least 10 remain active, according to public records.

Most are based at the Webster post office box or at a UPS store mailbox in Friendswood, which was also Stockman’s official 2012 campaign address, public records show.

Stockman names only Presidential Trust Marketing as providing any recent income, according to his 2013 disclosures.

Some of Stockman’s companies had ambitious plans that never materialized, according to news stories, press releases and Internet touts.

Within a year after his bankruptcy, Stockman had established at least three new businesses.

One of his 2003 businesses, based at an address in the British Virgin Islands, was called Chasseur Wilshire Ltd. At one time, that startup company had a small office at 11999 Katy Freeway in Houston.

So maybe he’s an ambitious entrepreneur, or maybe he’s that other thing that involves extensive use of post office boxes and shell companies.Here’s a look at what he was trying pull off last time, from an old Houston Press article in ’95.

Tagged with:
Posted in Tea Party

If Republicans Were Capable Of Nuance

Couldn’t have said it better. If only…

Andrew Sullivan's avatarThe Dish

Millman imagines an ideal Republican response to the Iran agreement and Healthcare.gov:

To me, there’s an obvious way for the GOP to respond to both developments: run against healthcare.gov as proof that Democrats can’t even build a website, and argue that the Iran deal vindicates a tough negotiating posture with adversaries, and now requires continued vigilance in implementation. But I suspect they will do neither, instead running against healthcare.gov as proof that government can’t even build a website (implicitly conceding that Republicans wouldn’t do any better), and arguing that the fact that we got a deal with Iran proves that we weren’t tough enough (implicitly conceding that their goal is continued conflict, possibly war, and not a solution to the nuclear standoff). In other words, I expect a depressingly ideological rather than pragmatic response to both the Administration’s failures and its successes.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized

Youth Unemployment is Not What It Seems

Someone beat me to my next article. That’s what happens when you take time out to watch some football.

Changes in the basic shape of a successful career may have a lot to do with both youth unemployment rates, and our declining work force participation. This also has serious implications for wage inequality. More on that to come, but this piece from The Atlantic sums it up well.

The larger point is that many college-educated young people are choosing not to take low-paying service-level jobs if they don’t absolutely have to. Because they can live with their parents (and as many as 45 percent of recent grads do) and because they rarely have much in the way of fixed costs such as homes and children, they can hold out for a job that matches their ambitions. They can also retool their skills as they discover that their college degree in marketing and communications may not leave them in the best position to get the type of job that they want.

This type of unemployment is one of choice—rational, legitimate choice—not of systemic failure. It is a challenge to find a meaningful job, but that hasn’t stopped people from trying. A youth cohort determined to create meaningful work should not be seen as lazy, lost or in dire straits. Instead it could be exactly the type who might actually lead the transition of our economy away from the making-stuff economy of the 20th century to an ideas economy of the 21st.

The employment picture for young people without a college degree is different. They’re being left further behind. According to the BLS, more than 30 percent of recent high school graduates who aren’t in college are unemployed, and the number is worse for those who dropped out of high school. African-Americans without a college degree, especially under the age of 20, have an unemployment rate that approaches 40 percent. African-Americans also have higher incarceration rates, especially males, and most states and companies enact punitive regulations that make employment for those with a prison record extremely challenging.

The full article is here.

Posted in Uncategorized

Will Quantum Computing Actually Work?

The story of the quantum computer is fascinating not just because of the technology involved, but because of its ties into politics, economic theory, corporate/government partnership, the government shutdown, the role of the religious right in undermining science education in the US, and the accelerating pace of dynamism.

If this technology can be reproduced on a commercial scale it will make the Internet look almost trivial. From Wired:

Built by a Canadian company called D-Wave, this quantum machine is one of only two in use around the world. Early research involving the system took a bit of a hit during the government shutdown last month, but things are now back up and running, with both NASA and Google running tests to better understand what the machine is actually capable of doing.

As Google runs its races, NASA is running simulations that could feed the International Space Station project and various supercomputing efforts. It’s an exciting time, says Rupak Biswas, the deputy director of the Exploration Technology Directorate at Ames: the dawn of the quantum computing age.

The D-Wave machine couldn’t be more different from the average computer. The thing won’t work unless it’s shielded from the Earth’s magnetic field. Parts of it get cooled to near absolute zero. And, because it must be carefully calibrated, you need about a month to boot it up. But the inner-workings of the system are still a bit of a mystery, and it’s not even clear whether this creation should be considered a true quantum computer.

More from Wired on how quantum computing works.

Posted in Economics

The Fate of a Hip Hop Republican

Some of you know that my posts often appear on another blog, hiphoprepublican.com, along with a lot of very promising black Republicans. Congressman Trey Radel, who was just arrested for cocaine possession, posted a piece there a few weeks ago. It’s interesting to look at it in retrospect. Here’s an excerpt offered without comment:

“My love of hip hop never ceased and included the aforementioned Chuck D of Public Enemy. Chuck said it best, “our freedom of speech is freedom or death.” This is a message we can all get behind, Republican or Democrat. I find a conservative message in “Fight the Power” because I believe when government expands it becomes a political tool meant to oppress. We see it when Chuck D addresses oppression and the Civil Rights movement or references the Black Panthers. We see it when NWA, or even old-school artists like Paris, address harassment from law enforcement. Targeting and oppression is happening today, from the IRS going after political groups to the government spying on journalists and everyday American citizens.”

Link to the full article:

http://www.hiphoprepublican.com/congressman-trey-radel-why-im-a-hip-hop-conservative/

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Uncategorized

Artur Davis: How the Right Turned Radical

Former Democratic Congressman Artur Davis is a guy Republicans should be paying a lot more attention to. What if we had someone in the party who had:

1) Defeated an African American liberal in a Congressional race

2) Won said victory by winning a majority of black votes

3) Built a track record of success on conservative principles in a minority community

That guy would be famous, right? Not so much.

Artur Davis is the Republican Party’s black Rosetta Stone, but he is getting no attention because he refuses to  say things that the Republican grassroots wants to hear. Like for example, this piece:

“We bargained on absorbing a hard-right insurgency when we should have been looking harder at its assumptions, and its radicalism.

When it got fashionable to peddle theories that voters—that is, our fellow citizens—were divided between productive contributors to capitalism and coddled takers of government giveaways, too much of the thought leadership of the party sagely nodded. And then when our presidential nominee got caught saying the same thing, we rolled our eyes at his political tin ear without acknowledging that what he said was actually an article of faith in some of our ranks.”

More from Artur Davis: How the Right Turned Radical

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Republican Party
Goodreads

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 448 other subscribers